Kering, the luxury group that owns Gucci, Balenciaga, Saint Laurent, and others, announced disappointing results for 2023 this week, and the fashion chorus, who for some reason thought Gucci designer Alessandro Michele was the tops, are bemoaning his firing again.
Gucci’s success is essential to Kering’s success—it’s the group’s cash cow, like Louis Vuitton at LVMH and Cartier at Richemont. As Gucci goes, so goes Kering. Though Michele was let go more than a year ago, his designs are still in stores, and that’s what’s not selling. The numbers prove that Kering’s chairman and chief executive François-Henri Pinault was right: Michele had to go.
But that’s not the only reason Gucci, once the absolute hottest brand in fashion, is struggling. The brand is stuck in the 1990s-early 2000s “accessible luxury” business model, chasing after the middle market consumer, when the rest of the luxury pack, as I explained in last week’s Style Files, has switched its primary focus to High-Net-Worth Individuals, a growing segment that is immune to economic cycles, and wants uniqueness, not mass. As one luxury analyst explained to me this week, “Alessandro’s Gucci was built on selling a lot of T-shirts, sneakers, and belts to young (Chinese) consumers each day.” And this does not make for a winning luxury brand today.
In a conference call this week, Kering management “acknowledged that Gucci’s communications lost focus and blurred the brand’s perception and the necessary balance between fashion and exclusivity, which supports the brand’s ability to attract a broad range of consumers,” Bernstein analyst Luca Solca reports.
How did this happen? Let’s take a look:
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dana Thomas to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.